PLANTS, THEIR PROPERTIES, YOUR BALANCE.
Botanical collection image: Hymenidium hookeri (Hymenidium hookeri (C.B.Clarke) Pimenov & Kljuykov)

BOTANICAL COLLECTION · APIACEAE

THE HERBARIUM · APIACEAE

Hymenidium hookeri

Hymenidium hookeri (C.B.Clarke) Pimenov & Kljuykov

Source topics

These topics describe what the sources discuss, including unproven claims and risks. They are not therapeutic recommendations.

Documentary entry
  • Indications recorded in Bhutanese materia medicaReported historical use
Plant partRoots (table wording)
FormsNo recommended preparation

Documentary entryReported uses only. No preparation or therapeutic use is recommended.

Documentary profile with limited evidence. Reported indications do not establish efficacy or justify self-medication or replacing medical care.

Identity & origin

BOTANICAL IDENTITY

The right name is the first step.

Hymenidium hookeri belongs to Apiaceae. Kew describes it as follows: it is a perennial and grows primarily in the subalpine or subarctic biome. The table uses Pleurospermum hookeri, linked here through POWO to the accepted name Hymenidium hookeri. The Dagala inventory gives the transliterated name “tang-kun-dkar-po”. This profile documents identity and medical tradition; it is not a therapeutic monograph.

Part used
Roots (table wording)
Origin & distribution
Native range according to POWO: NE. Afghanistan to China (NW. Yunnan). Wangchuk and colleagues record the species at Tshotshom, Dagala, Bhutan, at 3980 m.

Also known as: Pleurospermum hookeri, tang-kun-dkar-po

Identify Hymenidium hookeri (C.B.Clarke) Pimenov & Kljuykov precisely. A shared traditional name or membership of Hymenidium does not justify transferring uses. Plant-part wording follows the table without anatomical reinterpretation.

An illustration is not enough to identify a plant for consumption. Do not forage for a species based solely on this profile.

Uses & evidence

UNDERSTANDING THE USES

Properties & uses.

Reported historical use

Indications recorded in Bhutanese materia medica

Table 1 of the 2016 Dagala study associates roots (table wording) with inflammation, heart disorders and a traditional antidote role. These are traditional indications transcribed from texts and references for the g.so-ba-rig-pa system. The botanical record at Tshotshom is not an observation of recovery: this entry establishes neither causation nor clinical efficacy. The row does not specify a route or a species-specific preparation.

Use reported in a survey or inventory. This establishes neither benefit nor safety.

Read the source

The traditional uses described are not clinical proof of effectiveness. Evidence for one preparation cannot automatically be applied to another.

Precautions before use

BEFORE ANY USE

Precautions & contraindications.

This guidance does not cover every individual situation. Missing information is not a guarantee of safety.

The following warnings do not constitute a complete review of interactions or contraindications. An unstudied combination cannot be considered compatible.

Contraindications & precautions

  • The cited sources do not establish a contraindication assessment for this species. Consult a healthcare professional before any medicinal use.

Medicine interactions

  • Medicine combinations were not evaluated in this inventory. Ask a pharmacist or prescriber to review any intended medicinal use.

“Reported” does not prove causality; “possible” may reflect indirect evidence. “None reported” means none in the cited source, not that all combinations have been studied. Do not stop a prescribed treatment based on this profile.

Adverse effects

  • The study provides neither adverse-event monitoring nor event frequencies. Lack of measurement does not establish safety.

Pregnancy & breastfeeding

Pregnancy and breastfeeding: the selected sources provide no usable safety assessment; avoid self-medication with this plant.

Children & adolescents

Do not use this plant medicinally in children without professional direction. The inventory does not validate paediatric safety or an appropriate preparation.

If symptoms persist, worsen or are unusual, consult a healthcare professional. In an emergency, contact the emergency services.

Available evidence

EXPLORE THE EVIDENCE

The available evidence.

The 2016 inventory links the traditional name, part and altitude for Hymenidium hookeri. Fieldwork supports identification; medical texts supply the indications. Local inhabitants were not interviewed about treatments and no patients were followed.

Reported historical use

Reported use, without an effect demonstrated by this inventory

For Hymenidium hookeri, the part “roots (table wording)” appears in this medical repertoire. This traditional attribution establishes neither a pharmacological mechanism nor efficacy.

Use reported in a survey or inventory. This establishes neither benefit nor safety.

Read the reference

Limitations to keep in mind.

The source calls this apiaceous plant Pleurospermum hookeri. A root in the inventory is not a vegetable identified by resemblance; exact identification is essential when distinguishing Apiaceae.

Studies, findings & limitations

THE RESEARCH

What the research shows.

A laboratory or animal result alone does not demonstrate a benefit in humans. Each result must be read alongside the preparation studied and its limitations.

01Reported historical use

Dagala inventory: identity, location and resource status

Use reported in a survey or inventory. This establishes neither benefit nor safety.

Type of research
Field observations, photographs and herbarium specimens; identification cross-checked against Flora of Bhutan and botanical databases. Convenience sampling, without a comparison group or clinical outcome.
Preparation concerned
Recorded part: roots (table wording). The table gives no reproducible preparation specific to this species.
Observed results
At Tshotshom, 3980 m, the plant was classified as rare or infrequently observed in the surveyed sites and listed among species used by Menjong Sorig Pharmaceuticals at the time of the study. These findings describe resources and institutional practice in 2016.
Limitations to consider
Local abundance is not a global conservation assessment or a current measurement. The study cannot compare treatments or measure benefits and risks.
Read the reference

Documentary review dated 09/10/2026. The references remain available to check the context.

Sources & last review
Looking for personal guidance?View consultations · from $40 USD
WhatsApp Appointments